After several years of secrecy, it seems like Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx are finally ready to spill the beans not only about their relationship but also on their wedding. This is because Katie's ex-husband Tom Cruise finally gave her blessings on the reported wedding.
Hollywood Life said Cruise eventually signed off on Holmes' affair with Foxx, and that the couple can no longer wait to publicize the news. But what could have provoked Tom Cruise to finally approve the wedding?
It has been reported that Holmes and Foxx have kept their relationship secret because of a divorce contract that barred Holmes to enter in a relationship until 2017. It can be recalled that the actress filed for divorce from Cruise back in 2012.
Since the couple cannot anymore contain their desire to go public with their romance, it has been speculated that Foxx had a private chat with Cruise. Jamie told Cruise how much he loves Katie and that Suri needs a stable family.
A reliable source shared that Cruise, who has held to his guns over the years, finally agreed that it is time to break the no-public relationship clause. Tom was determined not to stand in the couple's way. He was also able to observe how Katie and Jamie are so serious and sincere in their relationship.
That could have prompted Cruise to finally let go of whatever is stated in the contract then eventually approved not only on the relationship but on the wedding.
The source also added that Foxx friendship with Cruise probably played a role also in Tom's sudden change of heart.
Tom and Jamie had been friends for years, and even after Jamie started seeing Katie, the two still stayed civil.
Meanwhile, as per HNGN, Jamie and Katie will get married in November and now that Tom's approval had been bestowed on the couple, another issue is slowly coming into play. People are clueless if Tom Cruise will attend their rumored wedding.
Now that Tom Cruise finally gave them the green light, will Jamie Foxx and Katie Holmes finally spill every detail of their relationship and their wedding?
