An esteemed molecular biologist has raised concerns about compelling evidence indicating that COVID-19 originated from China's Wuhan Institute of Virology and was potentially engineered by researchers at the Chinese lab.
Richard H. Ebright, a defined molecular biologist at Rutgers University, holds the position of Board of Governors Professor of Chemistry and Chemical Biology and serves as the Laboratory Director at the Waksman Institute of Microbiology.
Debate Reignites Over COVID-19 Origins
This photo taken on February 17, 2020 shows a member of the medical staff (L) checking the body temperature of a patient who has displayed mild symptoms of the COVID-19 coronavirus, at an exhibition centre converted into a hospital in Wuhan in China's central Hubei province. - The death toll from the COVID-19 coronavirus epidemic jumped to 1,868 in China on February 18 after 98 more people died, according to the National Health Commission. (Photo by STR / AFP) / China OUT
Recent statements by molecular biologist Dr. Richard H. Ebright and former New York Times editor Nicholas Wade have reignited debates on the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting the possibility of a lab-manufactured virus.
Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University, identified the relevance of a 2018 document from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, explaining it as an essential piece of evidence in the inquiry into the virus's beginnings. The document detailed a project named DEFUSE, with the goal of modifying bat coronaviruses to increase their ability to spread to humans.
The plan was rejected for financing by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), but Wade claimed that researchers in Wuhan, China may have undertaken similar research with assistance from the Chinese government.
Wade's assertion is based on the belief that viruses created following the DEFUSE protocol could have been present by the time COVID-19 emerged between August and November 2019. This, according to Wade, could explain the timing and origin of the pandemic, according to New York Post.
Lab-Based Origin for COVID-19
Furthermore, Wade emphasized the distinctive genetic structure of the coronavirus, allowing for fast infection in humans, as a persuasive sign of a likely lab-based origin. This structure allows the coronavirus to infect people immediately. He argued that in comparison to the majority of viruses, which need many tries to migrate from animal hosts to human hosts, SARS-CoV-2 was able to infect people with relative ease, indicating that it had already pre-adapted.
Dr. Filippa Lentzos expressed comparable worries at an address before the United Nations, indicating that there is a potential that the pandemic was caused by a mistake connected to laboratory research. Although Lentzos acknowledged the difficulties involved in clearly pinpointing the origins, he underlined the need of enhancing transparency and responsibility in the research activities that will be undertaken in the future.
The dispute comes from records that were made public in 2018 as a result of a request made under the Freedom of Information Act by the United States Right to Know. Project DEFUSE, which intended to boost the transmission of bat coronaviruses, was the subject of these documents, which comprised drafts and notes, respectively.
Recent remarks have fuelled conversations on the necessity of conducting an inquiry that is both comprehensive and transparent in order to establish the truth about the origins of the pandemic. This is despite the fact that experts continue to disagree whether the coronavirus originated naturally or as a result of human activity, News18 reported.
Related Article: Donald Trump Maintains Winning Run With Victory in Idaho Republican Caucuses
